When working with people, our
first impressions often influence the way we respond to and react with them - they presuppose what another’s strengths
or weaknesses might be because of the way they look, act or present themselves. We
limit (or elevate) their ability to contribute solely upon what WE THINK they might be able to accomplish. When we rush to judgment, defining the capabilities of others based on
what we perceive rather than through an analysis of their proven abilities or
and examination of the results they produce, we predispose their performance to
rise only to the level of competence our minds have established. Some dangers inherent in giving in to our
first impressions – particularly for those privileged to lead or manage others
– would include:
Pre-conceived
judgments, opinions or basing “today’s reality” on “yesterday’s history” about
a person can negatively influence our thoughts and actions – often encouraging
us to make inappropriate and potentially harmful decisions.
Our perceptions can cause us
to act more on what we feel than what may actually be fact – a dangerous and
unreliable driver when making significant decisions. The way others look, dress or speak can
indicate much about their actions, reactions and thoughts BUT it can also
mislead us into limiting (or elevating) their capabilities. When we label an individual based on what
they look like, sound like or appear to be we potentially lose the potential
they might bring to our organization – then wonder why the person did not
blossom as we hoped they would have when hired.
People tend to make judgments based on first impressions but must look
beneath the surface when determining the true value of an individual. Acting on what we think or feel can also mask
the “root causes” of a situation or hide the value of an individual. Delving into today’s political world, MUCH is
being said about “who hacked whom” in our most recent election and who valued
most from the secrets that were disclosed.
Focusing on the perception that “hacking is wrong” tends to minimize the
fact that what was “revealed” was wrong – that we are more concerned with HOW
our secrets are exposed than with the fact that they were questionable actions
in the first place. Great leaders take
the time needed to identify (and grow) the strengths of those working for them
while nurturing (and developing) their areas of weakness. Unless (and until) we look to leverage the
abilities of those we lead we will never be able to overcome the disabilities
that we all bring to the workplace.
We have all heard someone interrupt another by saying, “I
know what you are thinking…” or simply complete another’s sentence only to
hear, “That is not what I was going to say.”
When we assume what another thinks (or can contribute), we discount
anything they might say or do to improve a situation. Rather than defining another’s abilities
through a potentially inaccurate first impression it is better to ask
questions, listen to responses, and drill down to establish capabilities. Finding out what someone can contribute by
providing an environment allowing him or her to utilize their knowledge as they
leverage their experiences to realize their potential will accomplish much. Good managers like to win and often utilize
the capabilities of others to accomplish their defined objectives. Great leaders provide support and
encouragement to individuals as they seek to define and establish their own
reality within a broad framework which has been communicated as being safe and
acceptable – allowing them to learn from (rather than trying to prevent them
from) failure as they exceed established expectations..
We tend to fulfill our own prophecies when we allow
our first impressions to determine our expectations of others. We limit those around us when we establish ceilings
that define what we feel is their full potential and build floors that
establish how far they might be able to fall.
Keeping others safely wrapped within a cocoon of expectations may
protect them but will never allow them to transform from a caterpillar to the
butterfly they were meant to become.
Some individuals prefer to experience success ONLY by
achieving a specified result rather than by measuring progress – by finding
satisfaction ONLY in reaching the destination rather than experiencing pleasure
in every step along the way. They find
fulfillment in performing as directed rather than seeking new and innovative
solutions. Rather than focusing only
upon our end results, successful leaders measure progress to identify how far they
have come and how far they have yet to go – progress that can help determine
how close we are to the accomplishment of a goal while moving from past success,
previous failures or finding satisfaction in how far we may have advanced (rather
than looking ahead to what mountain we may yet climb). Great leaders leverage singular
accomplishments (their own as well as those of the people they lead) as springboards
propelling them towards future success (rather than as resting places from
ongoing change). Had someone not
imagined flight then sought results through practical efforts (rather than
stopping when their thoughts had materialized), we would never have joined the
birds in the sky after applying the dynamics of upward lift and power. The first impression teachers had of Albert
Einstein was his being a distracted individual having poor math skills who
would never fit into society – an impression he did not accept as a final
definition of his worth and value. He
chose to use the “label” as a springboard to accomplish what he dreamed possible rather than settling for what others thought probable.
When working with people, if we establish high expectations,
great things happen. We may find comfort
but will rarely experience satisfaction should we settle for something less
than the best. Since individuals tend to rise to the level they are expected to
reach – to accomplish the objectives that have been established for them (but
not often much more than that) – it is important that we overcome our tendency
to label people when we meet them, choosing instead to maintain an open mind as
we seek astonishing results. While
someone labeled “mediocre” or “lacking” during a first impression does not
often realize excellence, mediocrity will not find a place in the world when we
truly believe that all people are capable of accomplishing great things. IF we feel that our first impressions are
infallible – and seek to determine our direction based on our pre-conceived
values of others – we will thrive ONLY if we can accept that our initial
judgments may change and that what was once considered to be a reasonable
expectation may, in fact, be but a foundation for future growth. Should we choose to limit the contributions
of others through our unfounded first impressions, we actually hinder our own
success (as well as the worth and value of whomever we lead).
Great leaders find that it is easier to work with the
strengths of individuals than it is to develop their weaknesses – and that
communicating lofty goals and expectations is a precursor to their becoming
valued contributors. Do not let your
first impressions (be they overly positive as they may set others up to fail OR
too minimal as they may limit individual contributions) and misconceptions
be the driving force in determining success. Looking at what those working for us can accomplish
(rather than what they have done) – then equipping them to achieve greatness by
fulfilling their unique and individual potential – will allow us all to grow
and thrive.
No comments:
Post a Comment